V4A patch '*** Update File:', '*** Add File:', '*** Delete File:' headers
come from patch CONTENT, not the explicit `path=` argument. That makes
them attacker-influenceable through skill content, web extract output,
prompt injection, and other surfaces the agent processes. Headers like
'*** Update File: ../../../etc/shadow' would resolve relative to the
agent's cwd; in deployment configurations where that cwd is deep enough
to land outside Hermes' protected paths, the write could land somewhere
the agent operator did not intend.
Reject any V4A header containing a '..' path component before applying
the patch. The explicit `path=` argument on patch_tool is UNCHANGED —
the agent legitimately uses '..' there (e.g. `patch path='../other_module/x.py'`
from a worktree dir is normal cross-module editing).
Regression tests: V4A Update header with traversal rejected, V4A Add
header with traversal rejected, patch_v4a never invoked when rejection
fires.
Salvaged from PR #29395 by @waefrebeorn. The original PR added
has_traversal_component as a blanket reject on read_file_tool,
write_file_tool, patch_tool's explicit path, and search_tool — that
would break legitimate agent operation where '..' is normal. Also
dropped the over-eager skills_guard pattern additions
(pickle.loads/marshal.loads/ctypes.CDLL/importlib at high/critical
severity would false-positive on legit data-science and FFI skills).
Co-authored-by: teknium1 <127238744+teknium1@users.noreply.github.com>
5faea3f618