Files
hermes-agent/tests
xxxigm 5b6f0b695b test(tls-fd-recycle): pin shutdown-only + thread-aware close contract (#29507)
Ten regressions across both prongs of the #29507 fix, organised so each
test names exactly which way the bug could come back:

Prong 1 — ``force_close_tcp_sockets``:
* ``shutdown_only_no_close`` is the smoking-gun assertion. If a future
  refactor adds back ``sock.close()`` to this helper, the FD-recycling
  race that wrote TLS bytes on top of ``kanban.db`` is back, and this
  trips.
* ``uses_shut_rdwr`` pins that both halves are shut down (a half-close
  wouldn't unblock a worker stuck in ``recv``).
* ``swallows_oserror_on_shutdown`` covers the already-shutdown case.
* ``handles_multiple_pool_entries`` walks all pool connections.

Prong 2 — thread-aware ``_close_request_client_once``:
* ``stranger_thread_aborts_only_no_close`` simulates the asyncio_0 →
  Thread-1616 interrupt path: stranger drives abort, holder stays
  populated for the worker's eventual finally.
* ``owner_thread_pops_and_full_close`` is the worker-thread path: pops
  + full close.
* ``stranger_then_owner_close_sequence_runs_full_close_exactly_once``
  replays the reporter's exact timeline at object level: abort runs
  once, full close runs once, holder ends empty.

Agent surface:
* ``_abort_request_openai_client_does_not_call_client_close`` pins
  that the new entrypoint shuts sockets and emits the
  ``deferred_close=stranger_thread`` marker but never calls
  ``client.close()``.
* ``_abort_request_openai_client_null_client_is_noop`` defensive.

End-to-end:
* ``fd_recycle_window_closed_by_shutdown_only`` reproduces the race
  at object level — runs the abort path from a stranger thread and
  asserts that no ``close()`` ever fires, so the kernel can never
  recycle the FD under the owner's still-active reference.
2026-05-23 02:31:10 -07:00
..
2026-05-23 02:20:14 -07:00
2026-05-23 02:20:14 -07:00
2026-05-23 02:20:14 -07:00