SUMMARY_PREFIX previously contained two contradictory directives:
1. "treat it as background reference, NOT as active instructions"
"Do NOT answer questions or fulfill requests mentioned in this summary"
"Respond ONLY to the latest user message that appears AFTER this summary"
2. "Your current task is identified in the '## Active Task' section of the
summary — resume exactly from there."
When the latest user message contradicted Active Task (e.g. 'stop the
i18n refactor', 'never mind, look at grafana instead'), models tended to
follow (2) anyway because 'resume exactly' is a strong, unambiguous
directive — leading to repeated re-surfacing of already-cancelled work
across turns, even after explicit 'stop'/'don't keep bringing that up'
messages from the user.
This change:
- Removes the conflicting 'resume exactly from Active Task' clause.
- Makes the precedence explicit: latest user message is the single source
of truth; it WINS on conflict; cancelled Active Task / In Progress /
Pending User Asks / Remaining Work must be discarded entirely (no
'wrap up the old task first').
- Names canonical reverse signals (stop, undo, roll back, never mind,
just verify, topic change) so the model recognizes them as cancellation
triggers, not background context.
- Updates the summarizer template instruction so the LLM doesn't
mechanically copy a cancelled task into Active Task on the next
compaction (it's instructed to copy the reverse signal verbatim).
- Preserves: REFERENCE ONLY framing, MEMORY.md/USER.md authority, and
the 'don't repeat work already reflected in session state' clause.
Adds tests/agent/test_summary_prefix_semantics.py to pin invariants so
the conflict can't regress.
Tested:
- All compaction tests pass: tests/agent/test_context_compressor.py,
tests/agent/test_context_compressor_summary_continuity.py,
tests/run_agent/test_413_compression.py,
tests/run_agent/test_compression_persistence.py,
tests/run_agent/test_compression_boundary_hook.py,
tests/cli/test_manual_compress.py — 117/117 passing.
- Tested on macOS.